Asan-si in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Asan-si in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Asan-si plotted against Chungcheongnam-do and South Korea. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Asan-si's incremental SNDi rose from 1.56 to 1.74 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Asan-si ranked 1st out of 2 cities in Chungcheongnam-do and 3rd out of 49 in South Korea as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 1.74
- Rank in South Korea
- 2nd of 49
- Rank in Chungcheongnam-do
- 1st of 2
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 1.42
- Rank in South Korea
- 3rd of 49
- Rank in Chungcheongnam-do
- 1st of 2
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Ratchaburi, Thailand
- Tailândia, Brazil
- Encinitas, United States
- Rivera, Uruguay
- Norton, Zimbabwe
- Yelwa, Nigeria
In new street additions, Asan-si and Rivera both fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Ratchaburi built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. For the full street network, though, all three cities follow the same trend. Asan-si and Rivera have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.