Anapa in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Anapa in context

1.62.43.24<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
1.62.43.24<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
AnapaKrasnodar (Region)Russia (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Anapa plotted against Krasnodar and Russia. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Anapa's incremental SNDi rose from 1.92 to 2.55 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Anapa ranked 2nd out of 15 cities in Krasnodar and 33rd out of 252 in Russia as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
2.55
Rank in Russia
50th of 252
Rank in Krasnodar
2nd of 15

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
1.74
Rank in Russia
33rd of 252
Rank in Krasnodar
2nd of 15

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
AnapaHarbel CityLaobian

While Harbel City and Laobian both built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, Anapa built increasingly disconnected streets over time in new street additions. For the full network, Anapa became progressively more disconnected, while Harbel City grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved and Laobian grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved.