Blagoveshchensk in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Blagoveshchensk in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Blagoveshchensk plotted against Amur and Russia. The SNDi of new construction in Blagoveshchensk followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease, compared to Amur which rose steadily and Russia which rose steadily. Most recently, Blagoveshchensk's incremental SNDi fell from 5.13 to 3.76 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Blagoveshchensk ranked 1st out of 1 cities in Amur and 233rd out of 252 in Russia as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 3.76
- Rank in Russia
- 156th of 252
- Rank in Amur
- 1st of 1
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 3.99
- Rank in Russia
- 233rd of 252
- Rank in Amur
- 1st of 1
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Haarlem, Netherlands
- Oviedo / Uviéu, Spain
- Jaffna, Sri Lanka
- Maurepas, France
- Pickering, Canada
- Yizheng, China
While Haarlem and Maurepas both built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, Blagoveshchensk fluctuated in its street-construction patterns in new street additions. For the full network, Blagoveshchensk fluctuated in connectivity, while Haarlem became progressively more disconnected and Maurepas grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved.