Comparisons
Swietokrzyskie vs. the other two most closely populated regions in Poland: Lubuskie and Opolskie
Świętokrzyskie in context: Street-network sprawl of new development
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Świętokrzyskie rose steadily. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Świętokrzyskie, we can consider one of its most populous cities: Kielce. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Kielce peaked in 1991-2005.
How do development practices in Świętokrzyskie fare in comparison to others in Poland? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Świętokrzyskie was the 1st-most disconnected out of the 16 regions in Poland. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Świętokrzyskie ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2005 and 1st in 2006-2020.
Świętokrzyskie in context: Aggregate street-network sprawl
As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Świętokrzyskie is Kielce with an SNDi of 1.7, which is very well-connected. Conversely, the most connected city is Kielce with an SNDi of 1.7, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Kielce, Kielce
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Świętokrzyskie rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Świętokrzyskie, we can consider one of its most populous cities: Kielce. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Świętokrzyskie follow the same region trend.
To date, Świętokrzyskie is the 1st-most disconnected out of the 16 regions in Poland. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Świętokrzyskie ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2005 and 1st in 2006-2020.