The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Lubelskie rose steadily. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Lubelskie, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Lublin, Zamość and Chełm. Out of the three cities, Zamość and Chełm do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Zamość peaked in 1991-2005. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Chełm peaked in 1991-2005.

How do development practices in Lubelskie fare in comparison to others in Poland? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Lubelskie was the 2nd-most disconnected out of the 16 regions in Poland. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Lubelskie ranked 2nd in 1975, 3rd in 1976-1990, 2nd in 1991-2005 and 2nd in 2006-2020.

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Lubelskie is Chełm with an SNDi of 2.68, which is relatively well-connected. Conversely, the most connected city is Lublin with an SNDi of 1.87, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Lublin, Chełm

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Lubelskie rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Lubelskie, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Lublin, Zamość and Chełm. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Lubelskie follow the same region trend.

To date, Lubelskie is the 3rd-most disconnected out of the 16 regions in Poland. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Poland, the street network in Lubelskie has become more connected. Lubelskie ranked 2nd in 1975, 2nd in 1976-1990, 2nd in 1991-2005 and 3rd in 2006-2020.