The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Camarines Sur was at its lowest in 1976-1990. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Camarines Sur, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Naga, Iriga and Goa. Out of the three cities, Iriga does not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Iriga followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.

How do development practices in Camarines Sur fare in comparison to others in Philippines? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Camarines Sur was the 37th-most disconnected out of the 57 regions in Philippines. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Philippines, street construction in Camarines Sur has become more disconnected. Camarines Sur ranked 46th in 1975, 27th in 1976-1990, 30th in 1991-2005 and 37th in 2006-2020.

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Camarines Sur is Naga with an SNDi of 4.99, which is very sprawly. Conversely, the most connected city is Calabanga with an SNDi of 3.89, which is relatively sprawly. See trends for these cities: Calabanga, Naga

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Camarines Sur was at its lowest in 1976-1990. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Camarines Sur, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Naga, Iriga and Goa. Out of the three cities, Iriga does not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Iriga followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.

To date, Camarines Sur is the 38th-most disconnected out of the 57 regions in Philippines. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Philippines, the street network in Camarines Sur has become more disconnected. Camarines Sur ranked 46th in 1975, 35th in 1976-1990, 37th in 1991-2005 and 38th in 2006-2020.