Sullana in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Sullana in context

1.62.43.24<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
1.62.43.24<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
SullanaPiura (Region)Peru (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Sullana plotted against Piura and Peru. While Piura and Peru both followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, Sullana's new street additions followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease. Most recently, Sullana's incremental SNDi rose from 1.31 to 1.4 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Sullana ranked 1st out of 4 cities in Piura and 2nd out of 43 in Peru as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
1.4
Rank in Peru
3rd of 43
Rank in Piura
1st of 4

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
1.52
Rank in Peru
2nd of 43
Rank in Piura
1st of 4

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

36912<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
36912<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
SullanaChitrakoot DhamMancherial

While Chitrakoot Dham and Mancherial both built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then shifted to more disconnected patterns, Sullana fluctuated in its street-construction patterns in new street additions. For the full network, Sullana grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, while Chitrakoot Dham became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards and Mancherial became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards.