The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Lambayeque followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Lambayeque, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Chiclayo and Lambayeque. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Lambayeque follow the same region trend.

How do development practices in Lambayeque fare in comparison to others in Peru? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Lambayeque was the 15th-most disconnected out of the 22 regions in Peru. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Peru, street construction in Lambayeque has become more connected. Lambayeque ranked 4th in 1975, 12th in 1976-1990, 8th in 1991-2005 and 15th in 2006-2020.

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Lambayeque is Lambayeque with an SNDi of 2.27, which is well-connected. Conversely, the most connected city is Chiclayo with an SNDi of 1.91, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Chiclayo, Lambayeque

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Lambayeque followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Lambayeque, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Chiclayo and Lambayeque. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Chiclayo rose steadily. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Lambayeque peaked in 1976-1990.

To date, Lambayeque is the 5th-most disconnected out of the 22 regions in Peru. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Peru, the street network in Lambayeque has become more connected. Lambayeque ranked 4th in 1975, 5th in 1976-1990, 5th in 1991-2005 and 5th in 2006-2020.