Bajo Pichanaqui in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Bajo Pichanaqui in context

2.433.64.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.433.64.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Bajo PichanaquiJunin (Region)Peru (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Bajo Pichanaqui plotted against Junín and Peru. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Bajo Pichanaqui's incremental SNDi rose from 2.27 to 2.89 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Bajo Pichanaqui ranked 2nd out of 2 cities in Junín and 35th out of 43 in Peru as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
2.89
Rank in Peru
28th of 43
Rank in Junín
1st of 2

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
2.74
Rank in Peru
35th of 43
Rank in Junín
2nd of 2

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

246<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
246<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Bajo PichanaquiTrapaniArayat

In new street additions, Bajo Pichanaqui and Trapani both fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Arayat built increasingly disconnected streets over time. Looking at the full network, Trapani and Arayat both became progressively more disconnected, while Bajo Pichanaqui fluctuated in connectivity. Bajo Pichanaqui and Arayat have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.