Chitral in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Chitral in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Chitral plotted against Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Pakistan. The SNDi of new construction in Chitral was at its lowest in 1976-1990, compared to Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and Pakistan which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Chitral's incremental SNDi rose from 6.26 to 8.24 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Chitral ranked 45th out of 67 cities in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and 258th out of 292 in Pakistan as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 8.24
- Rank in Pakistan
- 269th of 292
- Rank in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa
- 52nd of 67
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 6.22
- Rank in Pakistan
- 258th of 292
- Rank in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa
- 45th of 67
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Kuransarae, India
- Kislovodsk, Russia
- Weining, China
- Guangshui, China
- Al-Rumaitha, Iraq
- Innsbruck, Austria
In new street additions, Chitral built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then shifted to more disconnected patterns, while Kuransarae fluctuated in its street-construction patterns and Guangshui built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. For the full network, Chitral became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards, while Kuransarae became progressively more connected and Guangshui grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. Notably, Chitral had a more connected network than Kuransarae in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.