Dordrecht in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Dordrecht in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Dordrecht plotted against Zuid-Holland and Netherlands. The SNDi of new construction in Dordrecht was at its lowest in 1976-1990, compared to Zuid-Holland which peaked in 1991-2005 and Netherlands which peaked in 1991-2005. Most recently, Dordrecht's incremental SNDi rose from 3.14 to 3.29 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Dordrecht ranked 5th out of 6 cities in Zuid-Holland and 42nd out of 43 in Netherlands as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 3.29
- Rank in Netherlands
- 40th of 43
- Rank in Zuid-Holland
- 4th of 6
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 3.14
- Rank in Netherlands
- 42nd of 43
- Rank in Zuid-Holland
- 5th of 6
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Siem Reap, Cambodia
- Derby, United Kingdom
- Chernivtsi, Ukraine
- Pavlodar, Kazakhstan
- Auraiya, India
- San Salvador de Jujuy, Argentina
In new street additions, Dordrecht built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then shifted to more disconnected patterns, while Siem Reap built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then shifted to more disconnected patterns and Pavlodar built increasingly disconnected streets over time. For the full network, Dordrecht became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards, while Siem Reap became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards and Pavlodar became progressively more disconnected. Dordrecht and Pavlodar have been converging in their street-network character since 1975.