The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Limburg peaked in 1991-2005. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Limburg, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Heerlen, Maastricht and Geleen. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Heerlen rose steadily. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Maastricht peaked in 1976-1990. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Geleen peaked in 1976-1990.

How do development practices in Limburg fare in comparison to others in Netherlands? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Limburg was the 5th-most disconnected out of the 10 regions in Netherlands. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Netherlands, street construction in Limburg has become more disconnected. Limburg ranked 6th in 1975, 7th in 1976-1990, 6th in 1991-2005 and 5th in 2006-2020.

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Limburg is Geleen with an SNDi of 1.82, which is very well-connected. Conversely, the most connected city is Heerlen with an SNDi of 1.75, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Heerlen, Geleen

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Limburg rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Limburg, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Heerlen, Maastricht and Geleen. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Limburg follow the same region trend.

To date, Limburg is the 6th-most disconnected out of the 10 regions in Netherlands. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Limburg ranked 6th in 1975, 6th in 1976-1990, 6th in 1991-2005 and 6th in 2006-2020.