Pyinmana [Nay Pyi Taw] in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Pyinmana [Nay Pyi Taw] in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Pyinmana [Nay Pyi Taw] plotted against Naypyitaw and Myanmar. The SNDi of new construction in Pyinmana [Nay Pyi Taw] peaked in 1991-2005, compared to Naypyitaw which peaked in 1991-2005 and Myanmar which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Pyinmana [Nay Pyi Taw]'s incremental SNDi fell from 3.3 to 2.56 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Pyinmana [Nay Pyi Taw] ranked 2nd out of 2 cities in Naypyitaw and 32nd out of 113 in Myanmar as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 2.56
- Rank in Myanmar
- 12th of 113
- Rank in Naypyitaw
- 2nd of 2
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 2.81
- Rank in Myanmar
- 32nd of 113
- Rank in Naypyitaw
- 2nd of 2
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Xingping, China
- Kanggye, North Korea
- Sandwip, Bangladesh
- Manono, Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Satkhira, Bangladesh
- Cascavel, Brazil
In new street additions, Pyinmana [Nay Pyi Taw] and Manono both built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved, while Xingping fluctuated in its street-construction patterns. Looking at the full network, Xingping and Manono both became progressively more disconnected, while Pyinmana [Nay Pyi Taw] grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. Pyinmana [Nay Pyi Taw] and Xingping have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.