Pavlodar in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Pavlodar in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Pavlodar plotted against Kazakhstan. Both Pavlodar and Kazakhstan follow the same trend. Most recently, Pavlodar's incremental SNDi rose from 3.14 to 3.4 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Pavlodar ranked 11th out of 32 in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 3.4
- Rank in Kazakhstan
- 23rd of 32
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 2.16
- Rank in Kazakhstan
- 11th of 32
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Dordrecht, Netherlands
- Siem Reap, Cambodia
- Derby, United Kingdom
- Auraiya, India
- San Salvador de Jujuy, Argentina
- Xiangcheng, China
In new street additions, Pavlodar and Auraiya both built increasingly disconnected streets over time, while Dordrecht built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then shifted to more disconnected patterns. For the full network, Pavlodar and Auraiya both became progressively more disconnected, while Dordrecht became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards. Pavlodar and Dordrecht have been converging in their street-network character since 1975.