The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Veneto peaked in 1991-2005. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Veneto, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Padua, Verona and Mestre. Out of the three cities, Padua and Verona do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Padua rose steadily. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Verona followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.

How do development practices in Veneto fare in comparison to others in Italy? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Veneto was the 11th-most disconnected out of the 17 regions in Italy. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Italy, street construction in Veneto has become more disconnected. Veneto ranked 12th in 1975, 10th in 1976-1990, 10th in 1991-2005 and 11th in 2006-2020.

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Veneto is Mestre with an SNDi of 3.49, which is relatively sprawly. Conversely, the most connected city is Venice with an SNDi of 1.37, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Venice, Mestre

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Veneto rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Veneto, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Padua, Verona and Mestre. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Veneto follow the same region trend.

To date, Veneto is the 11th-most disconnected out of the 17 regions in Italy. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Italy, the street network in Veneto has become more disconnected. Veneto ranked 12th in 1975, 13th in 1976-1990, 11th in 1991-2005 and 11th in 2006-2020.