Pelaihari in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Pelaihari in context

3456<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
3456<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
PelaihariKalimantan Selatan (Region)Indonesia (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Pelaihari plotted against Kalimantan Selatan and Indonesia. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Pelaihari's incremental SNDi rose from 4.34 to 4.89 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Pelaihari ranked 1st out of 9 cities in Kalimantan Selatan and 33rd out of 366 in Indonesia as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
4.89
Rank in Indonesia
99th of 366
Rank in Kalimantan Selatan
4th of 9

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
3.19
Rank in Indonesia
33rd of 366
Rank in Kalimantan Selatan
1st of 9

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

246810<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
246810<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
PelaihariTunchang CountyPach Pakri

In new street additions, Pelaihari built increasingly disconnected streets over time, while Tunchang County built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Pach Pakri built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then shifted to more disconnected patterns. For the full network, Pelaihari became progressively more disconnected, while Tunchang County grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Pach Pakri became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards. Notably, Pelaihari had a more sprawly network than Tunchang County in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.