Pare in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Pare in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Pare plotted against Jawa Timur and Indonesia. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Pare's incremental SNDi rose from 5.07 to 5.96 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Pare ranked 19th out of 57 cities in Jawa Timur and 125th out of 366 in Indonesia as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 5.96
- Rank in Indonesia
- 235th of 366
- Rank in Jawa Timur
- 45th of 57
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 3.93
- Rank in Indonesia
- 125th of 366
- Rank in Jawa Timur
- 19th of 57
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Suining, China
- Mawlamyine, Myanmar
- Samalut, Egypt
- Luton, United Kingdom
- Uttar Chandipur, India
- Pingdu, China
In new street additions, Pare built increasingly disconnected streets over time, while Suining built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then shifted to more disconnected patterns and Luton built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. For the full network, Pare became progressively more disconnected, while Suining became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards and Luton grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. Notably, Pare had a more connected network than Luton in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.