Curup in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Curup in context

4567<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
4567<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
CurupBengkulu (Region)Indonesia (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Curup plotted against Bengkulu and Indonesia. The SNDi of new construction in Curup followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, compared to Bengkulu which rose steadily and Indonesia which rose steadily. Most recently, Curup's incremental SNDi rose from 4.19 to 6.72 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Curup ranked 3rd out of 4 cities in Bengkulu and 129th out of 366 in Indonesia as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
6.72
Rank in Indonesia
305th of 366
Rank in Bengkulu
4th of 4

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
3.95
Rank in Indonesia
129th of 366
Rank in Bengkulu
3rd of 4

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

4812<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
4812<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
CurupChanglingRugao

In new street additions, Curup fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Changling built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then shifted to more disconnected patterns and Rugao built increasingly disconnected streets over time. For the full network, Curup and Rugao both became progressively more disconnected, while Changling became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards. Curup and Changling have been converging in their street-network character since 1975.