Karangasem in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Karangasem in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Karangasem plotted against Bali and Indonesia. The SNDi of new construction in Karangasem followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, compared to Bali which rose steadily and Indonesia which rose steadily. Most recently, Karangasem's incremental SNDi rose from 6.17 to 6.59 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Karangasem ranked 3rd out of 8 cities in Bali and 330th out of 366 in Indonesia as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 6.59
- Rank in Indonesia
- 298th of 366
- Rank in Bali
- 2nd of 8
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 5.71
- Rank in Indonesia
- 330th of 366
- Rank in Bali
- 3rd of 8
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
In new street additions, Karangasem and Oulu both fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Deqing built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then shifted to more disconnected patterns. For the full network, Karangasem and Oulu both became progressively more disconnected, while Deqing became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards. Karangasem and Deqing have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.