Chhibramau in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Chhibramau in context

2.43.244.8<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.43.244.8<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
ChhibramauUttar Pradesh (Region)India (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Chhibramau plotted against Uttar Pradesh and India. The SNDi of new construction in Chhibramau followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease, compared to Uttar Pradesh which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and India which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Chhibramau's incremental SNDi fell from 2.71 to 2.42 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Chhibramau ranked 61st out of 291 cities in Uttar Pradesh and 382nd out of 1868 in India as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
2.42
Rank in India
152nd of 1868
Rank in Uttar Pradesh
50th of 291

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
2.8
Rank in India
382nd of 1868
Rank in Uttar Pradesh
61st of 291

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

23456<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
23456<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
ChhibramauPaliQudsayya

While Pali and Qudsayya both built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, Chhibramau fluctuated in its street-construction patterns in new street additions. For the full network, Chhibramau became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards, while Pali grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Qudsayya grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. Notably, Chhibramau had a more sprawly network than Pali in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.