Bayana in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Bayana in context

2.73.64.55.4<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.73.64.55.4<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
BayanaRajasthan (Region)India (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Bayana plotted against Rajasthan and India. The SNDi of new construction in Bayana was at its lowest in 1976-1990, compared to Rajasthan which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and India which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Bayana's incremental SNDi rose from 4.3 to 5.53 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Bayana ranked 88th out of 95 cities in Rajasthan and 1146th out of 1868 in India as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
5.53
Rank in India
1228th of 1868
Rank in Rajasthan
85th of 95

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
4.15
Rank in India
1146th of 1868
Rank in Rajasthan
88th of 95

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

123456<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
123456<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
BayanaFresnilloChamarajanagara

In new street additions, Bayana built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then shifted to more disconnected patterns, while Fresnillo built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved and Chamarajanagara fluctuated in its street-construction patterns. For the full network, Bayana became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards, while Fresnillo grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Chamarajanagara fluctuated in connectivity. Bayana and Fresnillo have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.