Beed in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Beed in context

2.83.54.24.9<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.83.54.24.9<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
BeedMaharashtra (Region)India (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Beed plotted against Maharashtra and India. The SNDi of new construction in Beed rose steadily, compared to Maharashtra which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and India which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Beed's incremental SNDi rose from 3.83 to 4.99 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Beed ranked 124th out of 157 cities in Maharashtra and 1049th out of 1868 in India as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
4.99
Rank in India
1040th of 1868
Rank in Maharashtra
121st of 157

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
3.96
Rank in India
1049th of 1868
Rank in Maharashtra
124th of 157

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
BeedFaridpurMuridke

In new street additions, Beed and Faridpur both built increasingly disconnected streets over time, while Muridke built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. For the full street network, though, all three cities follow the same trend. Notably, Beed had a more sprawly network than Faridpur in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.