Rabakavi Banahatti in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Rabakavi Banahatti in context

1.82.73.64.5<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
1.82.73.64.5<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Rabakavi BanahattiKarnataka (Region)India (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Rabakavi Banahatti plotted against Karnataka and India. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Rabakavi Banahatti's incremental SNDi rose from 1.75 to 2.47 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Rabakavi Banahatti ranked 20th out of 96 cities in Karnataka and 299th out of 1868 in India as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
2.47
Rank in India
158th of 1868
Rank in Karnataka
9th of 96

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
2.62
Rank in India
299th of 1868
Rank in Karnataka
20th of 96

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

1.62.43.24<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
1.62.43.24<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Rabakavi BanahattiDondaichaGummi

In new street additions, Rabakavi Banahatti fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Dondaicha fluctuated in its street-construction patterns and Gummi built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. For the full network, Rabakavi Banahatti grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, while Dondaicha became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards and Gummi grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. Notably, Rabakavi Banahatti had a more sprawly network than Dondaicha in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.