Gaddanakeri Tanda in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Gaddanakeri Tanda in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Gaddanakeri Tanda plotted against Karnataka and India. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Gaddanakeri Tanda's incremental SNDi rose from 1.65 to 1.79 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Gaddanakeri Tanda ranked 4th out of 96 cities in Karnataka and 73rd out of 1868 in India as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 1.79
- Rank in India
- 92nd of 1868
- Rank in Karnataka
- 4th of 96
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 1.7
- Rank in India
- 73rd of 1868
- Rank in Karnataka
- 4th of 96
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
In new street additions, Gaddanakeri Tanda fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Cubal built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Metz built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. For the full network, Gaddanakeri Tanda fluctuated in connectivity, while Cubal grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Metz became progressively more disconnected. Notably, Gaddanakeri Tanda had a more sprawly network than Cubal in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.