Gadag-Betageri in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Gadag-Betageri in context

2.83.54.24.9<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.83.54.24.9<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Gadag-BetageriKarnataka (Region)India (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Gadag-Betageri plotted against Karnataka and India. The SNDi of new construction in Gadag-Betageri was at its lowest in 1991-2005, compared to Karnataka which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and India which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Gadag-Betageri's incremental SNDi rose from 2.52 to 2.93 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Gadag-Betageri ranked 24th out of 96 cities in Karnataka and 311th out of 1868 in India as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
2.93
Rank in India
241st of 1868
Rank in Karnataka
17th of 96

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
2.65
Rank in India
311th of 1868
Rank in Karnataka
24th of 96

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

246<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
246<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Gadag-BetageriPadang SidempuanXingyang

In new street additions, Gadag-Betageri and Xingyang both built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then shifted to more disconnected patterns, while Padang Sidempuan built increasingly disconnected streets over time. For the full network, Gadag-Betageri became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards, while Padang Sidempuan became progressively more disconnected and Xingyang became progressively more connected. Notably, Gadag-Betageri had a more connected network than Xingyang in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.