Bailhongal in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Bailhongal in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Bailhongal plotted against Karnataka and India. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Bailhongal's incremental SNDi rose from 3.05 to 3.73 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Bailhongal ranked 54th out of 96 cities in Karnataka and 564th out of 1868 in India as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 3.73
- Rank in India
- 485th of 1868
- Rank in Karnataka
- 38th of 96
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 3.18
- Rank in India
- 564th of 1868
- Rank in Karnataka
- 54th of 96
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Brianka, Ukraine
- Boulder, United States
- Pingyuan, China
- Barletta, Italy
- Um el Qusur, Egypt
- Obiaruku, Nigeria
Bailhongal, Brianka, and Barletta all fluctuated in its street-construction patterns in new street construction. For the full network, Bailhongal became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards, while Brianka fluctuated in connectivity and Barletta became progressively more disconnected.