Emmiganuru in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Emmiganuru in context

33.64.24.8<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
33.64.24.8<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
EmmiganuruAndhra Pradesh (Region)India (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Emmiganuru plotted against Andhra Pradesh and India. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Emmiganuru's incremental SNDi rose from 3.01 to 3.8 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Emmiganuru ranked 41st out of 91 cities in Andhra Pradesh and 598th out of 1868 in India as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
3.8
Rank in India
516th of 1868
Rank in Andhra Pradesh
35th of 91

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
3.23
Rank in India
598th of 1868
Rank in Andhra Pradesh
41st of 91

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

1.82.433.6<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
1.82.433.6<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
EmmiganuruKumboRongxian

In new street additions, Emmiganuru fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Kumbo built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Rongxian fluctuated in its street-construction patterns. For the full network, Emmiganuru and Kumbo both became progressively more disconnected, while Rongxian grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. Emmiganuru and Kumbo have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.