Nag Hammadi in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Nag Hammadi in context

33.64.24.8<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
33.64.24.8<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Nag HammadiQina (Region)Egypt (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Nag Hammadi plotted against Qina and Egypt. The SNDi of new construction in Nag Hammadi peaked in 1991-2005, compared to Qina which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease and Egypt which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Nag Hammadi's incremental SNDi fell from 5.14 to 4.15 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Nag Hammadi ranked 4th out of 8 cities in Qina and 136th out of 213 in Egypt as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
4.15
Rank in Egypt
98th of 213
Rank in Qina
4th of 8

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
4.07
Rank in Egypt
136th of 213
Rank in Qina
4th of 8

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

2.73.64.55.4<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.73.64.55.4<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Nag HammadiAs SamawahPathankot

While As Samawah and Pathankot both built increasingly disconnected streets over time, Nag Hammadi built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved in new street additions. For the full street network, though, all three cities follow the same trend. Notably, Nag Hammadi had a more sprawly network than Pathankot in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.