Rubaya in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Rubaya in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Rubaya plotted against Nord-Kivu and Democratic Republic of the Congo. The SNDi of new construction in Rubaya was at its lowest in 1991-2005, compared to Nord-Kivu which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and Democratic Republic of the Congo which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Rubaya's incremental SNDi rose from 4.9 to 5.21 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Rubaya ranked 12th out of 16 cities in Nord-Kivu and 165th out of 186 in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 5.21
- Rank in Democratic Republic of the Congo
- 124th of 186
- Rank in Nord-Kivu
- 9th of 16
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 5.77
- Rank in Democratic Republic of the Congo
- 165th of 186
- Rank in Nord-Kivu
- 12th of 16
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Tongnan, China
- Wollongong, Australia
- Yakeshi/Yaysi, China
- Chakia, India
- Badin, Pakistan
- Nanpara, India
In new street additions, Rubaya and Chakia both built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then shifted to more disconnected patterns, while Tongnan fluctuated in its street-construction patterns. For the full network, Rubaya became progressively more connected, while Tongnan grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved and Chakia became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards. Rubaya and Tongnan have been converging in their street-network character since 1975.