Rubaya in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Rubaya in context

246810<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
246810<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
RubayaNord-Kivu (Region)Democratic Republic of the Congo (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Rubaya plotted against Nord-Kivu and Democratic Republic of the Congo. The SNDi of new construction in Rubaya was at its lowest in 1991-2005, compared to Nord-Kivu which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and Democratic Republic of the Congo which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Rubaya's incremental SNDi rose from 4.9 to 5.21 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Rubaya ranked 12th out of 16 cities in Nord-Kivu and 165th out of 186 in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
5.21
Rank in Democratic Republic of the Congo
124th of 186
Rank in Nord-Kivu
9th of 16

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
5.77
Rank in Democratic Republic of the Congo
165th of 186
Rank in Nord-Kivu
12th of 16

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

369<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
369<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
RubayaTongnanChakia

In new street additions, Rubaya and Chakia both built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then shifted to more disconnected patterns, while Tongnan fluctuated in its street-construction patterns. For the full network, Rubaya became progressively more connected, while Tongnan grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved and Chakia became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards. Rubaya and Tongnan have been converging in their street-network character since 1975.