Villavicencio in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Villavicencio in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Villavicencio plotted against Meta and Colombia. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Villavicencio's incremental SNDi rose from 3.32 to 4.18 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Villavicencio ranked 2nd out of 2 cities in Meta and 53rd out of 83 in Colombia as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 4.18
- Rank in Colombia
- 57th of 83
- Rank in Meta
- 2nd of 2
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 3.12
- Rank in Colombia
- 53rd of 83
- Rank in Meta
- 2nd of 2
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Nagasaki, Japan
- Suizhou, China
- Franca, Brazil
- Rangkasbitung, Indonesia
- Tonghua, China
- Simferopol, Ukraine
In new street additions, Villavicencio fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Nagasaki built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved and Rangkasbitung built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. For the full street network, though, all three cities follow the same trend. Notably, Villavicencio had a more connected network than Nagasaki in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.