Comparisons

246<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
246<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
AmazonasGuaviarePutumayo

Amazonas vs. the other two most closely populated regions in Colombia: Guaviare and Putumayo

Amazonas in context: Street-network sprawl of new development

The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Amazonas followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Amazonas, we can consider one of its most populous cities: Leticia. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Amazonas follow the same region trend.

How do development practices in Amazonas fare in comparison to others in Colombia? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Amazonas was the 22nd-most disconnected out of the 30 regions in Colombia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Colombia, street construction in Amazonas has become more connected. Amazonas ranked 21st in 1975, 29th in 1976-1990, 23rd in 1991-2005 and 22nd in 2006-2020.

Amazonas in context: Aggregate street-network sprawl

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Amazonas is Leticia with an SNDi of 3.17, which is moderately connected. Conversely, the most connected city is Leticia with an SNDi of 3.17, which is moderately connected. See trends for these cities: Leticia, Leticia

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Amazonas rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Amazonas, we can consider one of its most populous cities: Leticia. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Amazonas follow the same region trend.

To date, Amazonas is the 21st-most disconnected out of the 30 regions in Colombia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Amazonas ranked 21st in 1975, 20th in 1976-1990, 22nd in 1991-2005 and 21st in 2006-2020.