Dinghai District in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Dinghai District in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Dinghai District plotted against Zhejiang and China. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Dinghai District's incremental SNDi rose from 1.78 to 2.37 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Dinghai District ranked 9th out of 116 cities in Zhejiang and 219th out of 1843 in China as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 2.37
- Rank in China
- 434th of 1843
- Rank in Zhejiang
- 26th of 116
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 1.98
- Rank in China
- 219th of 1843
- Rank in Zhejiang
- 9th of 116
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Jhenaidah, Bangladesh
- Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan
- Split, Croatia
- Agailjhara, Bangladesh
- Nampo, North Korea
- Kenema, Sierra Leone
In new street additions, Dinghai District fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Jhenaidah built increasingly disconnected streets over time and Agailjhara built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then shifted to more disconnected patterns. For the full network, Dinghai District fluctuated in connectivity, while Jhenaidah became progressively more disconnected and Agailjhara became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards. Notably, Dinghai District had a more sprawly network than Jhenaidah in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.