赵家沟 in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Zhao Jia Gou in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with 赵家沟 plotted against Liaoning and China. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, 赵家沟's incremental SNDi rose from 5.76 to 6.77 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, 赵家沟 ranked 61st out of 61 cities in Liaoning and 1707th out of 1843 in China as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 6.77
- Rank in China
- 1791st of 1843
- Rank in Liaoning
- 60th of 61
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 4.84
- Rank in China
- 1707th of 1843
- Rank in Liaoning
- 61st of 61
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
In new street additions, 赵家沟 fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Woldia built increasingly disconnected streets over time and Como built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. For the full street network, though, all three cities follow the same trend. 赵家沟 and Como have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.