Nuomuhuicun in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Nuomuhuicun in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Nuomuhuicun plotted against Liaoning and China. The SNDi of new construction in Nuomuhuicun followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease, compared to Liaoning which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and China which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Nuomuhuicun's incremental SNDi fell from 2.15 to 1.27 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Nuomuhuicun ranked 3rd out of 61 cities in Liaoning and 34th out of 1843 in China as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 1.27
- Rank in China
- 32nd of 1843
- Rank in Liaoning
- 4th of 61
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 1.42
- Rank in China
- 34th of 1843
- Rank in Liaoning
- 3rd of 61
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Shahin Shahr, Iran
- Jalal-Abad, Kyrgyzstan
- Nusaybin, Turkey
- Bedford, United Kingdom
- Chiang Rai, Thailand
- Kuala Kapuas, Indonesia
In new street additions, Nuomuhuicun fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Shahin Shahr built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved and Bedford built increasingly disconnected streets over time. For the full network, Nuomuhuicun fluctuated in connectivity, while Shahin Shahr grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved and Bedford became progressively more disconnected. Nuomuhuicun and Bedford have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.