Jinzhou in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Jinzhou in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Jinzhou plotted against Liaoning and China. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Jinzhou's incremental SNDi rose from 3.05 to 3.92 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Jinzhou ranked 21st out of 61 cities in Liaoning as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 3.92
- Rank in Liaoning
- 45th of 61
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 2.39
- Rank in Liaoning
- 21st of 61
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Mataram, Indonesia
- Firozabad, India
- Huaibei, China
- Cartagena, Colombia
- Dnipro, Ukraine
- Hengyang, China
In new street additions, Jinzhou and Cartagena both fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Mataram built increasingly disconnected streets over time. For the full street network, though, all three cities follow the same trend. Notably, Jinzhou had a more sprawly network than Cartagena in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.