巴虎屯村 in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Ba Hu Tun Cun in context

2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Ba Hu Tun Cun Jilin (Region)China (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with 巴虎屯村 plotted against Jilin and China. The SNDi of new construction in 巴虎屯村 peaked in 1976-1990, compared to Jilin which peaked in 1976-1990 and China which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, 巴虎屯村's incremental SNDi fell from 2.25 to 2.21 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, 巴虎屯村 ranked 20th out of 47 cities in Jilin and 623rd out of 1843 in China as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
2.21
Rank in China
342nd of 1843
Rank in Jilin
15th of 47

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
2.55
Rank in China
623rd of 1843
Rank in Jilin
20th of 47

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Ba Hu Tun Cun GudduLancaster

In new street additions, 巴虎屯村 built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, while Guddu fluctuated in its street-construction patterns and Lancaster built increasingly disconnected streets over time. For the full network, 巴虎屯村 grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, while Guddu fluctuated in connectivity and Lancaster became progressively more disconnected. Notably, 巴虎屯村 had a more sprawly network than Guddu in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.