Zhangjiagang in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Zhangjiagang in context

2.433.64.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.433.64.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
ZhangjiagangJiangsu (Region)China (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Zhangjiagang plotted against Jiangsu and China. The SNDi of new construction in Zhangjiagang peaked in 1976-1990, compared to Jiangsu which peaked in 1976-1990 and China which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Zhangjiagang's incremental SNDi fell from 3.32 to 3.18 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Zhangjiagang ranked 70th out of 101 cities in Jiangsu and 1173rd out of 1843 in China as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
3.18
Rank in China
990th of 1843
Rank in Jiangsu
60th of 101

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
3.19
Rank in China
1173rd of 1843
Rank in Jiangsu
70th of 101

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

2345<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2345<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
ZhangjiagangAbaBelgrade

While Aba and Belgrade both built increasingly disconnected streets over time, Zhangjiagang built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved in new street additions. Looking at the full network, Aba and Belgrade both became progressively more disconnected, while Zhangjiagang grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. Notably, Zhangjiagang had a more sprawly network than Belgrade in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.