Huaiyin District in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Huaiyin District in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Huaiyin District plotted against Jiangsu and China. The SNDi of new construction in Huaiyin District peaked in 1991-2005, compared to Jiangsu which peaked in 1976-1990 and China which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Huaiyin District's incremental SNDi fell from 2.56 to 2.27 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Huaiyin District ranked 37th out of 101 cities in Jiangsu and 532nd out of 1843 in China as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 2.27
- Rank in China
- 383rd of 1843
- Rank in Jiangsu
- 26th of 101
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 2.43
- Rank in China
- 532nd of 1843
- Rank in Jiangsu
- 37th of 101
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Brisbane, Australia
- Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
- Turin, Italy
- Amritsar, India
- San Antonio, United States
- Angeles, Philippines
In new street additions, Huaiyin District and Brisbane both built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved, while Amritsar built increasingly disconnected streets over time. Looking at the full network, Brisbane and Amritsar both became progressively more disconnected, while Huaiyin District fluctuated in connectivity. Huaiyin District and Brisbane have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.