Sanhe in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Sanhe in context

2.433.64.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.433.64.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
SanheHebei (Region)China (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Sanhe plotted against Hebei and China. The SNDi of new construction in Sanhe rose steadily, compared to Hebei which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and China which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Sanhe's incremental SNDi rose from 3.2 to 4.07 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Sanhe ranked 81st out of 120 cities in Hebei and 1156th out of 1843 in China as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
4.07
Rank in China
1426th of 1843
Rank in Hebei
92nd of 120

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
3.17
Rank in China
1156th of 1843
Rank in Hebei
81st of 120

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

246810<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
246810<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
SanhePandaulManikganj

In new street additions, Sanhe built increasingly disconnected streets over time, while Pandaul built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then shifted to more disconnected patterns and Manikganj fluctuated in its street-construction patterns. For the full network, Sanhe and Manikganj both became progressively more disconnected, while Pandaul became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards. Notably, Sanhe had a more connected network than Pandaul in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.