Luanzhou in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Luanzhou in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Luanzhou plotted against Hebei and China. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Luanzhou's incremental SNDi rose from 2.24 to 2.51 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Luanzhou ranked 38th out of 120 cities in Hebei and 653rd out of 1843 in China as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 2.51
- Rank in China
- 521st of 1843
- Rank in Hebei
- 24th of 120
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 2.59
- Rank in China
- 653rd of 1843
- Rank in Hebei
- 38th of 120
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Yenakiieve, Ukraine
- Tebela, Ethiopia
- Guaratinguetá, Brazil
- Inter-nishi, Japan
- Villa María, Argentina
- Chico, United States
In new street additions, Luanzhou fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Yenakiieve built increasingly disconnected streets over time and Inter-nishi built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. For the full network, Luanzhou and Inter-nishi both grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, while Yenakiieve became progressively more disconnected. Notably, Luanzhou had a more sprawly network than Inter-nishi in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.