Bazhou in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Bazhou in context

33.64.24.8<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
33.64.24.8<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
BazhouHebei (Region)China (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Bazhou plotted against Hebei and China. The SNDi of new construction in Bazhou was at its lowest in 1991-2005, compared to Hebei which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and China which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Bazhou's incremental SNDi rose from 3.27 to 4.99 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Bazhou ranked 106th out of 120 cities in Hebei and 1535th out of 1843 in China as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
4.99
Rank in China
1630th of 1843
Rank in Hebei
110th of 120

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
3.95
Rank in China
1535th of 1843
Rank in Hebei
106th of 120

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

34567<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
34567<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
BazhouNilamburPukhrayan

In new street additions, Bazhou built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then shifted to more disconnected patterns, while Nilambur built increasingly disconnected streets over time and Pukhrayan built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. Looking at the full network, Nilambur and Pukhrayan both became progressively more disconnected, while Bazhou became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards. Notably, Bazhou had a more sprawly network than Nilambur in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.