Pingnan in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Pingnan in context

2345<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2345<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
PingnanGuangxi (Region)China (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Pingnan plotted against Guangxi and China. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Pingnan's incremental SNDi rose from 1.49 to 2.26 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Pingnan ranked 4th out of 63 cities in Guangxi and 231st out of 1843 in China as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
2.26
Rank in China
380th of 1843
Rank in Guangxi
5th of 63

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
2.0
Rank in China
231st of 1843
Rank in Guangxi
4th of 63

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

123456<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
123456<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
PingnanHachinoheKhagmarihatpara

In new street additions, Pingnan fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Hachinohe built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved and Khagmarihatpara built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then shifted to more disconnected patterns. For the full network, Pingnan fluctuated in connectivity, while Hachinohe grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Khagmarihatpara became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards.