Pingnan in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Pingnan in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Pingnan plotted against Guangxi and China. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Pingnan's incremental SNDi rose from 1.49 to 2.26 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Pingnan ranked 4th out of 63 cities in Guangxi and 231st out of 1843 in China as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 2.26
- Rank in China
- 380th of 1843
- Rank in Guangxi
- 5th of 63
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 2.0
- Rank in China
- 231st of 1843
- Rank in Guangxi
- 4th of 63
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Hachinohe, Japan
- Manzhouli, China
- Pulandian, China
- Khagmarihatpara, India
- Gabes, Tunisia
- Salanga, Bangladesh
In new street additions, Pingnan fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Hachinohe built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved and Khagmarihatpara built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then shifted to more disconnected patterns. For the full network, Pingnan fluctuated in connectivity, while Hachinohe grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Khagmarihatpara became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards.