Liuzhou in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Liuzhou in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Liuzhou plotted against Guangxi and China. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Liuzhou's incremental SNDi rose from 2.99 to 3.27 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Liuzhou ranked 24th out of 63 cities in Guangxi and 918th out of 1843 in China as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 3.27
- Rank in China
- 1034th of 1843
- Rank in Guangxi
- 27th of 63
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 2.87
- Rank in China
- 918th of 1843
- Rank in Guangxi
- 24th of 63
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Kharkiv, Ukraine
- Anshan, China
- Mesa, United States
- Taizhou, China
- Tarogong, Indonesia
- Gorakhpur, India
In new street additions, Liuzhou and Taizhou both fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Kharkiv built increasingly disconnected streets over time. For the full street network, though, all three cities follow the same trend. Notably, Liuzhou had a more sprawly network than Taizhou in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.