锯木沟 in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Ju Mu Gou in context

468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Ju Mu Gou Chongqing (Region)China (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with 锯木沟 plotted against Chongqing and China. The SNDi of new construction in 锯木沟 peaked in 1976-1990, compared to Chongqing which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and China which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, 锯木沟's incremental SNDi fell from 6.64 to 4.26 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, 锯木沟 ranked 35th out of 47 cities in Chongqing and 1715th out of 1843 in China as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
4.26
Rank in China
1479th of 1843
Rank in Chongqing
28th of 47

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
4.91
Rank in China
1715th of 1843
Rank in Chongqing
35th of 47

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Ju Mu Gou MukallaShirvan

In new street additions, 锯木沟 and Shirvan both built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, while Mukalla built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then shifted to more disconnected patterns. For the full network, 锯木沟 and Shirvan both grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, while Mukalla became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards. 锯木沟 and Mukalla have been converging in their street-network character since 1975.