Tongling in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Tongling in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Tongling plotted against Anhui and China. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Tongling's incremental SNDi rose from 2.77 to 2.91 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Tongling ranked 38th out of 74 cities in Anhui and 660th out of 1843 in China as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 2.91
- Rank in China
- 821st of 1843
- Rank in Anhui
- 45th of 74
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 2.6
- Rank in China
- 660th of 1843
- Rank in Anhui
- 38th of 74
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Gemena, Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Pakpattan, Pakistan
- Batman, Turkey
- Muzaffargarh, Pakistan
- Caxias do Sul, Brazil
- Feni, Bangladesh
In new street additions, Tongling and Gemena both fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Muzaffargarh built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. For the full network, Tongling and Gemena both became progressively more disconnected, while Muzaffargarh grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. Notably, Tongling had a more sprawly network than Gemena in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.