Los Ángeles in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Los Angeles in context

2.433.64.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.433.64.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Los AngelesBio-Bio (Region)Chile (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Los Ángeles plotted against Bío-Bío and Chile. The SNDi of new construction in Los Ángeles rose steadily, compared to Bío-Bío which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase and Chile which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Los Ángeles's incremental SNDi rose from 3.32 to 3.57 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Los Ángeles ranked 4th out of 6 cities in Bío-Bío and 26th out of 38 in Chile as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
3.57
Rank in Chile
24th of 38
Rank in Bío-Bío
2nd of 6

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
3.19
Rank in Chile
26th of 38
Rank in Bío-Bío
4th of 6

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

1.82.433.6<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
1.82.433.6<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Los AngelesXiushuiKahama

In new street additions, Los Ángeles built increasingly disconnected streets over time, while Xiushui built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved and Kahama built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then shifted to more disconnected patterns. For the full network, Los Ángeles and Xiushui both became progressively more disconnected, while Kahama became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards. Los Ángeles and Kahama have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.