The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Amapá followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Amapá, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Macapá and Santana. Out of the two cities, Santana does not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Santana rose steadily.

How do development practices in Amapá fare in comparison to others in Brazil? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Amapá was the 22nd-most disconnected out of the 27 regions in Brazil. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Amapá ranked 22nd in 1975, 22nd in 1976-1990, 22nd in 1991-2005 and 22nd in 2006-2020.

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Amapá is Santana with an SNDi of 3.69, which is relatively sprawly. Conversely, the most connected city is Macapá with an SNDi of 2.81, which is relatively well-connected. See trends for these cities: Macapá, Santana

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Amapá rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Amapá, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Macapá and Santana. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Amapá follow the same region trend.

To date, Amapá is the 22nd-most disconnected out of the 27 regions in Brazil. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Amapá ranked 22nd in 1975, 22nd in 1976-1990, 22nd in 1991-2005 and 22nd in 2006-2020.