Agailjhara in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Agailjhara in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Agailjhara plotted against Barisal and Bangladesh. The SNDi of new construction in Agailjhara was at its lowest in 1991-2005, compared to Barisal which rose steadily and Bangladesh which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Agailjhara's incremental SNDi rose from 7.08 to 9.63 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Agailjhara ranked 11th out of 15 cities in Barisal and 171st out of 234 in Bangladesh as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 9.63
- Rank in Bangladesh
- 145th of 234
- Rank in Barisal
- 11th of 15
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 8.64
- Rank in Bangladesh
- 171st of 234
- Rank in Barisal
- 11th of 15
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Dinghai District, China
- Jhenaidah, Bangladesh
- Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan
- Nampo, North Korea
- Kenema, Sierra Leone
- Kamianske, Ukraine
In new street additions, Agailjhara built increasingly connected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then shifted to more disconnected patterns, while Dinghai District fluctuated in its street-construction patterns and Nampo built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. For the full network, Agailjhara became more connected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then grew more sprawly from 1991-2005 onwards, while Dinghai District fluctuated in connectivity and Nampo grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved.