Cleveland in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Cleveland in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Cleveland plotted against Queensland and Australia. The SNDi of new construction in Cleveland rose steadily, compared to Queensland which peaked in 1991-2005 and Australia which peaked in 1991-2005. Most recently, Cleveland's incremental SNDi rose from 5.17 to 5.43 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Cleveland ranked 10th out of 13 cities in Queensland and 31st out of 35 in Australia as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 5.43
- Rank in Australia
- 35th of 35
- Rank in Queensland
- 13th of 13
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 4.38
- Rank in Australia
- 31st of 35
- Rank in Queensland
- 10th of 13
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Muhammad Khel, Pakistan
- Multai, India
- Kashinathpur, Bangladesh
- Hadera, Israel
- Spring Hill, United States
- Sukorejo, Indonesia
In new street additions, Cleveland and Muhammad Khel both built increasingly disconnected streets over time, while Hadera built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. For the full street network, though, all three cities follow the same trend. Notably, Cleveland had a more sprawly network than Muhammad Khel in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.