Brisbane in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Brisbane in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Brisbane plotted against Queensland and Australia. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Brisbane's incremental SNDi fell from 4.88 to 4.75 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Brisbane ranked 5th out of 13 cities in Queensland and 17th out of 35 in Australia as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 4.75
- Rank in Australia
- 32nd of 35
- Rank in Queensland
- 11th of 13
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 3.55
- Rank in Australia
- 17th of 35
- Rank in Queensland
- 5th of 13
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
- Turin, Italy
- Sendai, Japan
- Huaiyin District, China
- Amritsar, India
- San Antonio, United States
In new street additions, Brisbane and Huaiyin District both built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved, while Ulaanbaatar built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. For the full network, Brisbane and Ulaanbaatar both became progressively more disconnected, while Huaiyin District fluctuated in connectivity. Brisbane and Huaiyin District have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.